Key result
Baseline PDAY risk scores in young adulthood more strongly predicted coronary artery calcium 25 years later than concurrent scores (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.25-1.33 vs OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.11-1.14).
Why the study?
Does the PDAY risk score measured in young adulthood better predict coronary and abdominal aortic calcium 25 years later compared to scores measured concurrently?
Population
3008 participants aged 18 to 30 years from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study
Comparison
Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis… vs PDAY scores measured 25 years later
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
25 years
Authors
Loading...
Early PDAY scores may better stratify long-term CAC risk than concurrent measures; extends observational evidence on cumulative exposure but requires validation.
Cohort (n=3,008)
Does the PDAY risk score measured in young adulthood better predict coronary and abdominal aortic calcium 25 years later compared to scores measured concurrently?
Effect estimate: OR 1.29 (95% CI 1.25-1.33)
Atherosclerosis risk assessed in young adulthood provides strong prediction of future subclinical atherosclerosis, highlighting the importance of early risk exposure.
Gidding et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Subclinical atherosclerosis (n=3,008). Baseline PDAY risk score (years 0) vs. Year 25 PDAY risk score was evaluated on Presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) per 1-point higher score (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.33). Baseline PDAY risk scores in young adulthood more strongly predicted coronary artery calcium 25 years later than concurrent scores (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.25-1.33 vs OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.11-1.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: