Key result
Invasive assessment of microvascular function in patients with valvular heart disease showed reduced coronary flow reserve compared to controls (3.2 vs 4.3, P=0.005).
Why the study?
Does valvular heart disease alter coronary microvascular function (IMR and CFR) compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=60)
Does valvular heart disease alter coronary microvascular function (IMR and CFR) compared to controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.2% vs 4.3%
p-value: p=0.005
In patients with valvular heart disease, coronary flow reserve is reduced due to increased resting coronary flow and decreased resting microvascular resistance, rather than intrinsic microvascular disease.
Reduced CFR with preserved IMR in valvular disease warrants caution interpreting microvascular dysfunction; leaves open prospective outcome studies.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate microvascular function in patients with valvular heart disease (VHD), which causes chronic left ventricular volume and/or pressure overload, therefore change in coronary microvascular hemodynamics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 30 patients with VHD considered for surgery (10 aortic stenosis, 12 aortic regurgitation, and eight mitral regurgitation) and 30 controls. Intracoronary physiological assessments were performed in the unobstructed left anterior descending artery using a pressure-temperature sensor guidewire at rest and hyperemia. RESULTS: The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was similar between the two groups (16.2±6.5 vs. 16.2±8.5, P=0.997), whereas coronary flow reserve (CFR) was lower in the VHD group compared with the controls (3.2±1.4 vs. 4.3±1.7, P=0.005). Resting and hyperemic coronary distal pressure, and hyperemic mean transit time were similar between VHD and controls, whereas resting mean transit time was significantly shorter (0.70±0.29 vs. 0.89±0.39, P=0.035) and baseline resting microvascular resistance was significantly lower in the VHD group compared with the controls (58.1±25.4 vs. 78.1±36.7, P=0.011). Patients with aortic stenosis showed numerically higher IMR values than aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, and controls, although this was not statistically significant (20.4±6.9, P=0.14). CFR was significantly correlated with log high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels in patients with VHD (r=-0.523, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: CFR was reduced in patients with VHD compared with controls, despite similar microvascular function as assessed by IMR. This appeared to be mainly because of an increased resting coronary flow accompanied by a decreased resting coronary microvascular resistance rather than microvascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishi et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Valvular heart disease (n=60). Invasive assessment of microvascular function vs. Controls was evaluated on Coronary flow reserve (CFR) (p=0.005). Invasive assessment of microvascular function in patients with valvular heart disease showed reduced coronary flow reserve compared to controls (3.2 vs 4.3, P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: