Key result
Cardiac resynchronization therapy yielded a 75% response rate at 6 months, with no difference in response between patients with and without baseline depression.
Why the study?
Does baseline depression affect the clinical response rate to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with severe heart failure?
Observational (n=68)
Does baseline depression affect the clinical response rate to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with severe heart failure?
Baseline depression does not attenuate the clinical response to CRT, and successful CRT response is associated with a reduction in depressive symptoms at 6 months.
CRT eligibility decisions need not factor in baseline depression; leaves open causal effects on sustained response in randomized data.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between depression and heart failure is neither coincidental nor trivial, since depression is a powerful predictor of re-hospitalization and mortality. We prospectively studied the prevalence and impact of depression on the clinical outcomes of patients attending for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We specifically examined whether patients with depression have a different rate of response to CRT and whether CRT has an effect on depressive symptoms. METHODS: Sixty-eight recipients of CRT systems were included. The depressive status was evaluated before implant and after 6 months by a structured diagnostic interview measuring Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria of major depression and by a self-report questionnaire (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, CES-D). The CRT response was assessed at 6 months by a clinical composite score. RESULTS: At inclusion, DSM-IV criteria of major depression were identified in 41% of the population, while using the self-report questionnaire 65% were observed to have mild to major depressive symptoms (CES-D ≥ 16). Only 4 patients were taking antidepressants. At 6 months, 75% were considered responders to CRT. Response to CRT did not differ between those with and without depression at baseline. The rate of patients with depression at 6 months was significantly lower in responders to CRT compared with nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of depressive symptoms in patients receiving CRT systems. Patients with depression should not be excluded from CRT, because they demonstrate a similar rate of response than the persons without depression and the responders are less likely to be depressed at 6 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ploux et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Severe Heart Failure (n=68). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs. Patients without depression was evaluated on CRT response at 6 months by a clinical composite score. Cardiac resynchronization therapy yielded a 75% response rate at 6 months, with no difference in response between patients with and without baseline depression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: