Key result
New algorithms and conduction system pacing increasingly overcome complex LV pacing challenges in CRT.
Why the study?
Left ventricle pacing presents distinct challenges related to its lead/tissue interface, lead stability, pacing thresholds, and capture issues that warrant exploration alongside emerging conduction system pacing options.
This review highlights ongoing technical challenges and emerging solutions in left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy, including conduction system pacing.
Technical challenges in LV pacing for CRT persist despite new algorithms; leaves open comparative efficacy of conduction system pacing pending prospective trials.
Left ventricle (LV) pacing can be considered peculiar due to its different lead/tissue interface (epicardial pacing) and the small vein wedging lead locations with less reliable lead stability. The current technologies available for LV capture automatic confirmation adopt the evoked response (ER), as well as "LV pace to right ventricular (RV) sense" algorithms. The occurrence of anodal RV capture is today completely solved by the use of bipolar LV leads, while intriguing data are recently published regarding the unintentional LV anodal capture beside the cathodal one, which may enlarge the front wave of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivery. The LV threshold behavior over time leading to ineffective CRT issues (subthreshold stimulation or concealed loss of capture), the extracardiac capture with phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), the flexible electronic cathode reprogramming and the inadequate CRT delivery related to inadequate AV and VV pace timing (and its management by LV "dromotropic pace-conditioning") are discussed. Moreover, recently, His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) have shown growing interest to prevent pacing-induced cardiomyopathy as well as for direct intentional CRT. The purpose of the present review is to explore these new challenges regarding LV pacing starting from old concepts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zoppo et al. (2021) conducted a review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and electrical dyssynchrony requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. Left ventricular pacing was evaluated. Left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy involves complex challenges such as automatic capture confirmation, anodal capture, and pacing timing, which are increasingly addressed by new algorithms and alternative techniques like His bundle and left bundle branch pacing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: