Key result
Ticagrelor monotherapy after primary PCI matches DAPT for MACCE but reduces non-access site bleeding ~80%.
Why the study?
Ticagrelor monotherapy after short DAPT is safe and effective after PCI, but whether directly omitting aspirin after primary PCI reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic events was unconfirmed.
Does ticagrelor monotherapy reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic events compared to dual antiplatelet therapy in STEMI patients after primary PCI?
RCT (n=200)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does ticagrelor monotherapy reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic events compared to dual antiplatelet therapy in STEMI patients after primary PCI?
Effect estimate: HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.26-4.17)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.1% vs 4%
Ticagrelor monotherapy directly after primary PCI for STEMI significantly reduces non-access site bleeding without an apparent increase in ischemic events, though larger trials are needed to confirm efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor monotherapy after a short period of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has shown to be safe and effective after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including primary PCI in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, direct omission of aspirin could further reduce bleeding risk. AIMS: We aimed to assess the impact of ticagrelor monotherapy directly after primary PCI regarding ischemic events, and to investigate the effect on clinical bleeding events. METHODS: In this multicentre open-label pilot study, 200 STEMI patients were 1:1 randomised to ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin, directly after primary PCI. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) and bleeding were assessed at 13 months. Incidence of intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH) was compared. RESULTS: In the ticagrelor monotherapy group (n=98) and DAPT group (n=101), MACCE occurred in 4.1% versus 4.0% (HR:1.04, 95%CI: 0.26-4.17). Clinically relevant bleeding was observed in 4.1% versus 10.9% (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.12-1.17), and clinically relevant non-access site bleeding in 2.0% versus 9.9% (HR:0.20, 95%CI: 0.04-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: While no significant difference in ischemic events was observed between ticagrelor monotherapy and DAPT in the first thirteen months after primary PCI, this pilot study is underpowered to confirm efficacy. In addition, non-access site bleeding events were significantly reduced and all clinical bleeding events tended to be reduced. Incidence of IMH was similar between groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yosofi et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=200). Ticagrelor monotherapy vs. Ticagrelor plus aspirin (DAPT) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.26-4.17). Ticagrelor monotherapy directly after primary PCI yielded similar MACCE rates as DAPT (4.1% vs 4.0%; HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.26-4.17) but significantly reduced non-access site bleeding (2.0% vs 9.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: