Key result
NOACs linked to ~27% lower risk of diabetic retinopathy vs warfarin at 5 years.
Why the study?
To evaluate the risks of developing diabetic retinopathy and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy requiring interventions in patients with diabetes mellitus receiving NOACs compared with warfarin.
Do NOACs reduce the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy and requiring ophthalmic interventions in patients with diabetes mellitus compared to warfarin?
Cohort (n=245,958)
Yes
Do NOACs reduce the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy and requiring ophthalmic interventions in patients with diabetes mellitus compared to warfarin?
In patients with diabetes mellitus requiring anticoagulation, NOACs are associated with a significantly lower risk of developing diabetic retinopathy and needing ocular interventions compared to warfarin.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for lower DR risk with NOACs versus warfarin in diabetes; RCTs needed before practice change.
AIMS: To evaluate risks of developing diabetic retinopathy (DR) and vision-threatening DR requiring interventions in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with those taking warfarin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 375 280 and 122 979 patients with DM initiated on NOACs and warfarin, respectively, before propensity score matching (PSM). TriNetX was used to identify patients with DM treated with NOACs or warfarin. PSM was performed to control for baseline demographics and medical comorbidities. Outcome measures included hazard ratios (HR) of developing DR, proliferative DR (PDR), diabetic macular oedema (DME) and requiring an ocular intervention within 6 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years. RESULTS: NOACs and warfarin cohorts contained 122 979 patients. Patients receiving NOACs had significantly lower risks of DR (6 months: HR, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.60-0.72; 1 year: HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.63-0.73; 3 years: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67-0.74; 5 years: HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70-0.76). The robustness of these findings extended to all secondary endpoints, including the incidence of PDR, DME and the need for treatments for vision-threatening DR, across all follow-up intervals (6 months, 1 years, 3 years and 5 years). CONCLUSIONS: Taking NOACs was associated with lower risks of developing DM-related ocular complications than taking warfarin in patients with DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Diabetes mellitus (n=245,958). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Developing diabetic retinopathy (DR) at 5 years (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.76). NOACs were associated with a lower risk of developing diabetic retinopathy at 5 years compared to warfarin in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: