Key result
Large right-to-left shunt linked to ~4-fold higher recurrent stroke risk in medically managed PFO.
Why the study?
Right-to-left shunt size may predict PFO-related stroke in cryptogenic ischemic stroke, but results have been controversial.
Does a large right-to-left shunt increase the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke and medically managed PFO compared to a small shunt?
Cohort (n=234)
No
Does a large right-to-left shunt increase the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke and medically managed PFO compared to a small shunt?
Odds Ratio: 4.09 (95% CI 1.04–16)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.1% vs 2.2%
p-value: p=0.043
In patients with cryptogenic stroke and medically managed PFO, a large right-to-left shunt is independently associated with a four-fold increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke compared to a small shunt.
May warrant closer monitoring in large-shunt PFO but should not yet change closure decisions; leaves open need for prospective validation.
Introduction: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a potential source of cardiac embolism in cryptogenic ischemic stroke, but it may also be incidental. Right-to-left shunt (RLS) size may predict PFO-related stroke, but results have been controversial. In this cohort study of medically-managed PFO patients with cryptogenic stroke, we aimed to investigate the association of shunt size with recurrent stroke, mortality, newly detected atrial fibrillation (AF), and to identify predictors of recurrent stroke. Methods: Patients with cryptogenic stroke who screened positive for a RLS using a transcranial Doppler bubble study were included. Patients who underwent PFO closure were excluded. Subjects were divided into two groups: small (Spencer Grade 1, 2, or 3; n = 135) and large (Spencer Grade 4 or 5; n = 99) shunts. The primary outcome was risk of recurrent stroke, and the secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and newly detected AF. Results: The study cohort included 234 cryptogenic stroke patients with medically-managed PFO. The mean age was 50.5 years, and 31.2% were female. The median period of follow-up was 348 (IQR 147-1096) days. The rate of recurrent ischemic stroke was higher in patients with large shunts than in those with small shunts (8.1% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.036). Multivariate analyses revealed that a large shunt was significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke [aOR 4.09 (95% CI 1.04–16.0), p = 0.043]. Conclusions: In our cohort of cryptogenic stroke patients with medically managed PFOs, those with large shunts were at a higher risk of recurrent stroke events, independently of RoPE score and left atrium diameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cryptogenic ischemic stroke with medically managed patent foramen ovale (n=234). Large right-to-left shunt (Spencer Grade 4 or 5) vs. Small right-to-left shunt (Spencer Grade 1, 2, or 3) was evaluated on Recurrent ischemic stroke (aOR 4.09, 95% CI 1.04-16.0, p=0.043). In patients with cryptogenic stroke and medically managed patent foramen ovale, a large right-to-left shunt was significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (aOR 4.09).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: