Why the study?
Does risk stratification according to the CHADS2 score predict cerebral infarction in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Does risk stratification according to the CHADS2 score predict cerebral infarction in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
The CHADS2 score is a useful and effective marker for predicting the risk of cerebral infarction in Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
CHADS2 may aid cerebral infarction risk assessment in Japanese nonvalvular AF; extends validation but remains hypothesis-generating pending prospective trials.
Cerebrovascular events increase with additional risk factors in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The relative risk proportional to the number of risk factors in Japanese patients has not been reported. The prevalence of risk factors was investigated for over 2 years in a prospective cohort study of 265 patients with NVAF. The CHADS2 score is a widely used risk stratification scheme that includes age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke, and heart failure. Cerebral infarction occurred in 23 patients. This group was significantly older and had a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension. The ratio of a CHADS2 score of 0 - 2 was 77% among patients without stroke, but 44% in the cerebral infarction group. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the predictive factors of cerebral infarction were: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.087 (confidence interval (CI) 1.032 - 1.145, P = 0.002), hypertension (OR 3.288 (CI 1.086 - 9.962, P = 0.03) and CHADS2 score (OR 1.762 (CI 1.222 - 2.543, P = 0.002). Furthermore, a CHADS2 score of 3 - 6 was associated with a greater risk of cerebral infarction (OR 4.420 (CI 1.838 - 10.631, P < 0.001). The CHADS2 score was a useful marker of stroke risk in this Japanese population. An increased CHADS2 score was associated with an approximate 1.8-fold increase in risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masaki et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: