Key result
Digoxin remains an undisputed medication for rate control in atrial fibrillation, especially for heart failure patients, due to its low cost and established expertise.
Why the study?
Does digoxin provide effective ventricular rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Systematic Review
Does digoxin provide effective ventricular rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Digoxin remains a valuable, low-cost option for rate control in atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with concomitant heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports digoxin for rate control in AF with HF; reinforces Level 1 consensus on its established role.
Although digitalis has been used since the last century, it seems to be in the process of being progressively abandoned. However, digoxin has demonstrated a large positive benefit in terms of reduction of morbidity in heart failure patients with sinus rhythm, while the sometimes-observed increase in mortality is dramatically reduced with low serum concentrations. Digoxin, which is the only digitalis currently available, remains one of three drugs used for rate control in atrial fibrillation. Even if digoxin alone is insufficient to provide rate control during exertion in most patients, the optimal cardiac rate both at rest and at exertion is still undetermined, as is the importance of achieving sufficient rate control in asymptomatic patients. Because of its low cost and the accumulated knowledge and expertise about prescription, digoxin probably will remain an undisputed medication for rate control for atrial fibrillation, especially for heart failure patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maury et al. (2014) conducted a systematic review in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Digoxin was evaluated. Digoxin remains an undisputed medication for rate control in atrial fibrillation, especially for heart failure patients, due to its low cost and established expertise.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: