Why the study?
Does left atrial appendage mechanical reserve determined after electrical cardioversion predict long-term sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
Does left atrial appendage mechanical reserve determined after electrical cardioversion predict long-term sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
Left atrial appendage mechanical reserve assessed by transesophageal echocardiography with isoproterenol infusion after cardioversion independently predicts long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.
May aid post-cardioversion rhythm-risk stratification in chronic AF; leaves open prospective validation before guiding therapy.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate the long-term prognostic implication of left atrial appendage (LAA) mechanical reserve determined after electrical cardioversion (CV) of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: 53 successfully cardioverted chronic AF patients were studied (M/F =40/13, mean age =59+/-3). LAA emptying velocity (LAAEV) and filling velocity (LAAFV) were measured using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before cardioversion, immediately after CV, and with isoproterenol infusion. TEE was done at baseline, 1 month, 3-6 months, and 1 year after CV. At 1-year follow-up, 27 patients remained in sinus rhythm (SR, Group 1) and 26 patients showed AF recurrence (Group 2). Baseline clinical and echocardiographic findings were similar between the 2 groups. Immediately after CV, LAAEV and LAAFV decreased similarly in both groups. With isoproterenol infusion, the increase of LAAEV was greater in group 1 than in group 2. Multivariate analysis revealed that the peak increase of LAAEV after isoproterenol infusion was an independent predictor for SR maintenance (odds ratio 1.044, 95% confidence interval 1.014 to 1.075; p=0.0033). Prediction model consisting of the peak increase of LAAEV (>34.4 cm/s) and E/A ratio immediately after CV (<2.5) showed a good predictability for SR maintenance (correct ratio 69.8%). CONCLUSION: This study presents a valid evaluation method for LAA mechanical reserve and demonstrated that LAA mechanical reserve is responsible for the maintenance of SR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: