Why the study?
Does a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent reduce target lesion failure compared to a permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease?
Does a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent reduce target lesion failure compared to a permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease?
Bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stents provide similar 12-month clinical outcomes in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease.
Comparable outcomes support either stent in small-vessel CAD; extends evidence of similar efficacy for these platforms.
AIMS: CENTURY II is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial comparing the bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting Ultimaster® stent (BP-SES) with the permanent polymer everolimus-eluting XIENCE stent (PP-EES). Here we present a pre-specified analysis of safety and efficacy outcomes in a subgroup of patients with small vessel coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: CENTURY II included 525 patients with lesions of reference diameter ≤2.5 mm. Treatment was randomly assigned: 277 patients received BP-SES (399 lesions) and 248 patients received PP-EES (377 lesions). The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), which is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularisation (TLR). There was no significant difference between treatment groups in baseline or procedural data. Mean pre-procedural reference diameter was similar (BP-SES 2.30±0.40 mm, PP-EES 2.31±0.42 mm, p=0.59). Stented length was 24.0±11.7 mm for BP-SES and 23.5±11.5 mm for PP-EES (p=0.45). At 12 months, there was no significant difference between the BP-SES and PP-EES groups in TLF (6.9% vs. 7.7%; p=0.72), cardiac death (1.1% vs. 1.2%; p=0.90), target vessel MI (1.8% vs. 3.2%; p=0.30), TLR (4.0% vs. 5.7%; p=0.37), or definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.7% vs. 1.2%; p=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: In the large-scale, randomised CENTURY II trial, use of BP-SES and PP-EES for the treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease resulted in similar outcomes at 12 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wöhrle et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: