Why the study?
Elderly people are particularly affected by rising systolic blood pressure, prompting investigation into whether resting blood pressure-reducing isometric exercise training can be delivered in a group setting with older adults.
Does handgrip isometric exercise training reduce resting blood pressure in older adults?
Does handgrip isometric exercise training reduce resting blood pressure in older adults?
Handgrip isometric exercise training may reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in older adults, with effects persisting up to 6 weeks after training ceases, though between-group differences were not statistically significant in this small study.
Background Elderly people are particularly affected by rising systolic blood pressure (SBP). We hypothesized that resting blood pressure (RBP)-reducing isometric exercise training (IET) can be delivered in a group setting with older adults. Methods Participants (63–88 years; N = 19) completed IET at 30% maximum voluntary contraction, 3 days a week for 12 weeks. RBP was measured weekly throughout, plus 6 weeks posttraining. Control participants did not engage in IET (N = 5). Changes in RBP were assessed using a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results IET induced significant reductions in SBP (−10.5 mmHg; P < 0.05), but SBP also declined unexpectedly in the control group (−4.5 mmHg; P < 0.05). Diastolic blood pressure declined in the IET group only (−4.7 mmHg; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups for SBP or diastolic blood pressure ( P > 0.05). At 6 weeks posttraining, SBP was still 9.4 mmHg below baseline in the IET group only. A unique finding was that the clinically significant RBP reductions persisted for 6 weeks after IET. Conclusions Handgrip IET may be an effective antihypertensive intervention, which persists for several weeks in older adults, even when training ceases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: