Why the study?
Does the CAPTOR method improve the depiction of the entire cardiac cycle compared to standard prospectively reconstructed sequences?
Does the CAPTOR method improve the depiction of the entire cardiac cycle compared to standard prospectively reconstructed sequences?
The CAPTOR reconstruction method improves cardiac imaging by capturing the entire cardiac cycle, potentially providing more reliable measures of EDV, stroke volume, and ejection fraction.
May enhance EDV assessment via fuller cycle capture in retrospective CMR; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
A method is proposed to reconstruct multiphase images that accurately depicts the entire cardiac cycle. A segmented, gradient-recalled-echo sequence (FASTCARD) was modified to acquire data continuously. Images were reconstructed retrospectively by selecting views from each heartbeat based on cardiac phase rather than the time elapsed from the QRS complex. Cardiac phase was calculated using a model that compensates for beat-to-beat heart rate changes. Images collected using cardiac phase to order reconstruction (CAPTOR) depict the entire cardiac cycle and lack the temporal gap that is characteristic of prospectively reconstructed sequences. Time-volume curves of the left ventricle capture the contribution of atrial contraction to end-diastolic volume (EDV). Transmitral phase-contrast flow measurements show a second peak inflow (alpha wave) that is absent in the standard sequence. Because atrial contraction contributes to ventricular EDV, images using CAPTOR potentially may provide a more reliable measure of EDV, stroke volume, and ejection fraction than standard techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feinstein et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: