Why the study?
Higher central pulse pressure links to higher CFPWV, smaller AoR, and CVD risk, prompting the hypothesis that combined smaller AoR and higher CFPWV increases CVD risk.
Does the combination of aortic root diameter and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity predict the incidence of cardiovascular disease?
Does the combination of aortic root diameter and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity predict the incidence of cardiovascular disease?
The prognostic significance of aortic root diameter combined with arterial stiffness for predicting cardiovascular disease risk varies significantly between men and women.
Sex-specific aortic root and stiffness associations with CVD should not yet change practice; leaves open prospective validation of combined measures.
Higher central pulse pressure is associated with higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CFPWV) and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). A smaller aortic root diameter (AoR) is associated with higher central pulse pressure. We hypothesized that the combination of a smaller AoR and higher CFPWV is associated with increased CVD risk (relative to a larger AoR and lower CFPWV). We tested this hypothesis in the community-based Framingham Study (N=1970, mean age 60 years, 57% women). We created sex-specific longitudinal echocardiographic AoR trajectories over 2 decades, categorizing participants into smaller versus larger AoR groups. We cross-classified participants based on their AoR trajectory and CFPWV (dichotomized at the sex-specific median). We used Cox regression to relate the cross-classified groups to CVD incidence on follow-up (median 17 years): lower CFPWV, larger AoR (referent group; 6.4/1000 person-years); lower CFPWV, smaller AoR (6.9/1000 person-years); higher CFPWV, larger AoR (23.1/1000 person-years); and higher CFPWV, smaller AoR (21.9/1000 person-years). In sex-pooled analyses, groups with higher CFPWV were associated with a multivariable-adjusted 1.8-fold risk of CVD ( P <0.01) regardless of AoR size. We observed effect modification by sex ( P for sex×AoR-CFPWV group interaction 0.04). In men, the group with smaller AoR and higher CFPWV was associated with a 2.5- to 2.8-fold risk of CVD ( P <0.001). In women, the group with larger AoR and higher CFPWV experienced a statistically nonsignificant 70% to 80% higher CVD risk. Our observations indicate that the prognostic significance of a smaller versus larger AoR varies in men versus women. Additional studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vasan et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: