Key result
Inspiron stent matches contemporary DES for 12-month MACE in very small vessels.
Why the study?
Does the Inspiron drug-eluting stent provide comparable clinical outcomes to other contemporary drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing PCI in very small-caliber vessels?
Observational (n=793)
No
Does the Inspiron drug-eluting stent provide comparable clinical outcomes to other contemporary drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing PCI in very small-caliber vessels?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Brazilian-manufactured Inspiron drug-eluting stent demonstrates comparable 12-month safety and efficacy to other contemporary DES in very small-caliber coronary vessels.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in very small-caliber vessels (≤2.25 mm) presents technical challenges and is associated with poorer outcomes compared to larger vessels. The Inspiron® stent, a drug-eluting stent (DES) manufactured in Brazil, has been evaluated in multiple studies; however, data on its performance in vessels smaller than 2.5 mm are lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PCI using DES in very small-caliber vessels and to compare the Inspiron® stent with other contemporary DES platforms. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization. METHODS: We conducted an observational study including a consecutive sample at a Brazilian reference center from 2017 to 2021. Outcomes were assessed in-hospital, at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months, using a 5% threshold for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 783 DES were implanted: 47% Inspiron® and 46.8% other DES. The mean patient age was 64.7 ± 11 years; 61% were male, and 42% had diabetes mellitus. At 12 months, the overall MACE rate was 4.54% (36/793), with no difference between groups (Inspiron®: 4.6% vs. other DES: 4.6%; p=1.000). Individual endpoints and stent thrombosis rates were also similar (4 [1.0%] vs. 2 [0.5%]; p=0.868). CONCLUSION: our findings show that the Inspiron® stent has acceptable safety and efficacy and provides comparable 12-month clinical outcomes to other contemporary DES in very small-caliber coronary vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slaviero et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Percutaneous coronary intervention in very small-caliber vessels (n=793). Inspiron® stent vs. Other contemporary drug-eluting stents was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (p=1.000). The Inspiron® stent showed similar 12-month rates of major adverse cardiac events compared to other contemporary drug-eluting stents in very small-caliber vessels (4.6% vs. 4.6%; p=1.000).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: