Why the study?
Does endovascular stenting provide an effective alternative to surgical endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery disease?
Does endovascular stenting provide an effective alternative to surgical endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery disease?
This review summarizes the rationale, indications, and techniques for using endovascular stenting as an alternative to surgical endarterectomy in carotid artery disease.
May inform individualized carotid revascularization choices; leaves open need for updated randomized comparisons to endarterectomy.
Over the last 5 years, the clinical use of intravascular stents for treatment of carotid artery pathology has become more prevalent and the spectrum of potential indications has widened. Endovascular stenting is providing an alternative to surgical endarterectomy for treatment of cervical carotid artery atherosclerotic disease. This has prompted a North American, randomized, controlled clinical trial directly comparing these two therapies. In this article we review the major surgical endarterectomy trials that currently provide the scientific rationale for revascularization of carotid artery occlusive disease, critically evaluate the evidence supporting the application of endovascular stenting procedures for the treatment of occlusive and nonocclusive disease of the extracranial and intracranial carotid artery, consider the current clinical indications for use of stents in the carotid artery, and discuss current equipment, technique, and potential procedure-related complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phatouros et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: