Key result
Carotid stenting matches endarterectomy in symptomatic patients under 70, but endarterectomy remains safer for older patients.
Why the study?
The comparative safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy surgery versus endovascular stenting for symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis remain uncertain, especially in asymptomatic patients and older populations.
Does carotid stenting improve perioperative outcomes and stroke prevention compared to carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid stenosis?
Systematic Review
Does carotid stenting improve perioperative outcomes and stroke prevention compared to carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid stenosis?
Carotid stenting is a viable alternative to endarterectomy for symptomatic patients under 70, but surgery remains the safer and more effective option for older symptomatic patients.
Limits revascularization to highest-risk plaques only; reinforces optimized medical therapy as first-line for most carotid stenosis patients.
Carotid stenosis in the extracranial tract determines 10-15% of all ischaemic strokes. The aim of treatment, therefore, is to prevent major neurological events. Carotid endarterectomy surgery has proved effective in this regard, with various randomized studies that have demonstrated its validity in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. As an alternative, since the late 1990s, the endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis by stenting has gradually established itself. Numerous controlled clinical trials have compared surgery and carotid stenting in terms of perioperative outcomes (death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure) and stroke prevention ipsilateral to the lesion treated during follow-up, evaluating both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. From the systematic review of the data, it is legitimate to state that stenting may represent a safe alternative to conventional surgery in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis under the age of 70, while endarterectomy is clearly safer and more effective than endovascular treatment for symptomatic older patients. On the other hand, as regards asymptomatic patients, the available evidence is limited and further data are needed to compare the two methods and to compare them with the best current medical therapy in order to draw conclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giudice et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Carotid stenosis. Carotid stenting vs. Carotid endarterectomy was evaluated on Perioperative outcomes (death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within 30 days) and stroke prevention ipsilateral to the lesion. Carotid stenting is a safe alternative to endarterectomy in symptomatic patients under 70, while endarterectomy is safer and more effective for older symptomatic patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: