Why the study?
Does carotid artery stenting reduce the risk for future strokes compared to surgical carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid-artery stenosis?
Does carotid artery stenting reduce the risk for future strokes compared to surgical carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid-artery stenosis?
Carotid artery stenting is comparably effective to surgical endarterectomy for stroke prevention in patients with carotid stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide procedural choice in carotid stenosis; leaves open need for updated randomized data.
Evaluation of: Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G et al.; the CREST Investigators. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis (CREST trial). N. Engl. J. Med. 363(1), 11–23 (2010).Stroke has a high incidence and is associated with a dramatic degree of morbidity and mortality. Carotid stenosis is responsible for approximately 20% of strokes in all patient populations, and is especially prevalent in elderly patients. Therapies to decrease the risk of stroke are urgently warranted. The first established therapy was surgical endarterectomy. Over the last few years, however, carotid artery stenting has evolved as a less invasive approach. Hitherto, the paper under evaluation (the North American Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial [CREST]) is the largest and most important study comparing these two treatment modalitites. The study demonstrates comparable effectiveness for carotid stenting and carotid artertectomy to reduce the risk for future strokes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pascal Meier (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: