Key result
Carotid stenting is linked to higher peri-procedural stroke but lower MI risk versus endarterectomy.
Why the study?
The comparative risks and benefits of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy and medical therapy in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis remain uncertain.
Does carotid artery stenting improve outcomes compared with carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid stenosis?
Does carotid artery stenting improve outcomes compared with carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid stenosis?
Carotid artery stenting offers a less invasive alternative to endarterectomy with lower myocardial infarction risk but higher peri-procedural stroke risk, particularly in older patients.
Highlights peri-procedural risk trade-offs for individualized carotid revascularization decisions; leaves open confirmation in updated randomized trials.
Atherosclerotic carotid stenosis accounts for about 15% of ischemic strokes. Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting has emerged as a potentially less invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, randomized clinical trials in patients with symptomatic stenosis have shown that carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher risk of peri-procedural stroke compared with carotid endarterectomy. Carotid artery stenting is associated with a lower risk of peri-procedural myocardial infarction and local complications (cranial nerve palsies, access site hematoma) and appears to be as durable as carotid endarterectomy in terms of long-term protection against ipsilateral stroke and risk of restenosis. The main risk factors for peri-procedural stroke in patients treated with carotid artery stenting are age >70 years and high burden of white-matter lesions on brain imaging. Patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis receiving modern medical treatment have a low risk (<1%/year) of ipsilateral stroke and it is uncertain whether the benefit of revascularization still justifies the procedural risk of stroke or death. In particular, the small excess of procedural risk of stroke associated with carotid artery stenting (compared with carotid endarterectomy) may offset the small benefit (if any) of carotid endarterectomy versus medical therapy in unselected patients. Randomized clinical trials are ongoing to solve this issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calvet et al. (2015) conducted a review in Atherosclerotic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting vs. Carotid endarterectomy was evaluated. Carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher risk of peri-procedural stroke but a lower risk of myocardial infarction and local complications compared with carotid endarterectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: