Why the study?
Does professional volleyball training improve autonomic cardiac modulation compared to recreational aerobic training in healthy men?
Does professional volleyball training improve autonomic cardiac modulation compared to recreational aerobic training in healthy men?
Professional volleyball training is associated with greater resting vagal tone and autonomic cardiac modulation compared to recreational aerobic training, potentially offering superior protection against exercise-induced arrhythmias.
May indicate benefits of elite volleyball for autonomic modulation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before clinical adoption.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the autonomic cardiac modulation between professional volleyball players (VP) and recreational aerobically trained individuals (RAT). Methods: Twentyeight men were divided into two groups, (VP; n = 14) and (RAT; n = 14) and each group was subjected to a sub-maximal progressive ramp treadmill test. Cardiac cycle beat to beat (RR) intervals, was obtained through electrocardiogram recording with the test being stopped when the individual reached 85% of their maximum age-predicted heart rate (HR). The heart rate variables were calculated from ECG using MATLABbased algorithms. Results: At rest, RAT showed lower values of the mean value of RR interval, the root mean square successive difference of all RR intervals (r-MSSD), low frequency (LF) and total power spectral (TP) when compared to VP. No significant difference between groups was noted for high frequency (HF) and index LF/HF. After exercise, no significant differences were measured between groups. Mean values of VO2, VE/VO2, and VE showed no significant difference at rest and post effort. Conclusion: The variables such as frequency, intensity and volume may to interfere the autonomic cardiac modulation and possibly indicating a superior protection against exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias and lower risk of sudden cardiac deaths
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maior et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: