Key result
Universal pharmacotherapies fail to reduce HFpEF mortality, underscoring individualized management of comorbidities.
Why the study?
Randomized controlled trials have struggled to establish an evidence base for reducing morbidity and mortality in HFpEF, compounded by an incomplete understanding of its underlying pathophysiology.
What are the current and emerging treatment strategies for managing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
What are the current and emerging treatment strategies for managing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
This review highlights that while understanding of HFpEF pathophysiology is improving, universal evidence-based therapies to reduce mortality remain elusive, necessitating individualized, comorbidity-driven management.
Supports individualized comorbidity management in HFpEF; leaves open targeted trials to identify mortality-reducing therapies in specific phenotypes.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasing in prevalence as the general population ages. Poorly managed heart failure symptoms of decompensated HFpEF is one of the most common reasons for prolonged hospital admission. The high rate of morbidity and mortality associated with HFpEF is compounded by a poor understanding of the underpinning pathophysiology. Randomized controlled trials have so far been unable to identify an evidence base for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with HFpEF, although there is some evidence to support quality of life (QOL) improvement. In this review, we described the recent advances on the pathophysiological understanding of HFpEF, the current and emerging treatment strategies, and what this may mean for individual patients. Potential treatments for HFpEF were divided into their relative management strategies and the current evidence assessed for effect on HFpEF mortality, hospital admission frequency, and QOL improvement. Overall, the understanding of HFpEF pathophysiology is improving and has been made a priority in identifying potential therapeutic targets. There is growing evidence that patients with ejection fractions (EF) of less than 60% may obtain a mortality benefit from ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists. However, this covers only a small proportion of the HFpEF spectrum. Therefore, currently there are no universal treatment strategies recommended for HFpEF, and management should focus on an individualised approach and this should take into account the comorbidities of each patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (2020) conducted a review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for HFpEF vs. Standard care or placebo was evaluated. Currently, there are no universal pharmacological treatment strategies recommended that reduce mortality in HFpEF, and management should focus on an individualized approach addressing comorbidities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: