This chapter argues that a structural analysis of international relations does not lend support to these earnest hopes. It presents a theory of nuclear weapons proliferation. The chapter argues that in a bipolar system the superpowers do have a specific role: their preponderance allows them to attenuate systemic characteristics. It provides examples of nuclear weapons proliferation and the creation of nato to show that a concerted effort by a superpower in a bipolar system reduces the influence of systemic characteristics such as the security dilemma and reliance on self-help. The chapter outlines a structural analysis of international politics, highlighting those elements of the theory that bear more directly on the question of proliferation. It discusses the structure of post-Second World War international politics to show the causal relationship between bipolarity and the slow pace of nuclear proliferation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin Frankel (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: