Why the study?
Does the use of a semi-automatic blood pressure device reduce end-digit preference compared to a conventional sphygmomanometer when values are manually transcribed?
Population
2199 hypertensive patients treated with lercanidipine (10-20 mg) by 504 physicians in general practice.
Comparison
Blood pressure measurement using a validated… vs Blood pressure measurement using a standard…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
8 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Manual transcription of semi-automatic BP readings retains substantial end-digit preference; leaves open whether direct electronic transfer reduces bias in trials.
Does the use of a semi-automatic blood pressure device reduce end-digit preference compared to a conventional sphygmomanometer when values are manually transcribed?
Even with semi-automatic devices, manual transcription of blood pressure values leads to significant end-digit preference, highlighting the need for direct data transfer systems to avoid bias in assessing antihypertensive efficacy.
Burnier et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: