Key result
Cardiac implantable electrical devices, including pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy, have evolved over 60 years to improve patient prognosis.
Why the study?
As CIEDs continue to evolve, continuous updates in relevant knowledge and ensuring appropriate indications for device implantation are needed.
This historical review highlights the 60-year evolution and current clinical utility of cardiac implantable electrical devices for managing arrhythmias and heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Affirms CIED utility in arrhythmia and HF care; leaves open need for prospective studies on next-generation devices.
Since its approval for reimbursement in 1974 in Japan, the artificial pacemaker (PM) for the treatment of bradycardia has come into wide clinical use. In the years that have followed, remarkable structural and functional progress has been made with PMs and the associated lead systems, and the reliability of the PM as an implanted artificial device has been established. In 1996, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) became the next reimbursed device, approved as a therapy for fatal ventricular arrhythmias. ICD have contributed to improved prognosis in patients with these arrhythmias through preventing sudden cardiac death. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was recognized as the next effective modality for drug-refractory chronic heart failure. CRT became reimbursable in 2004, followed by CRT with defibrillator function in 2006. Large-scale randomized trials and meta-analyses have confirmed the reduced overall mortality with CRT. Currently, these implanted devices are essential therapeutic modalities, collectively known as cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), for indications from symptomatic bradycardia and fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmia to severe chronic heart failure. As CIEDs continue to evolve, we should always be updating relevant knowledge and ensuring appropriate indications for CIED implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuji Nakazato (2020) conducted a review in Bradycardia, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and severe chronic heart failure. Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices (CIEDs) was evaluated. Cardiac implantable electrical devices, including pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy, have evolved over 60 years to improve patient prognosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: