Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of preprocedural total coronary occlusion on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era.Methods: Of 13,707 patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health database, 2,920 consecutive patients with STEMI having single-vessel disease within 48 hours of symptom onset who underwent primary PCI were categorized by preprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade: 0 (n = 1,966), I or II (n = 583), and III (n = 371). Co-primary outcomes were all-cause death and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular event (MACCE) at 3 years.Results: Patients with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 were more likely to have longer symptom-to-door time, higher body weight, higher Killip class, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher peak troponin I, and lower postprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 (94.5% vs. 100%, P < 0.001) compared to those with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality (8.1% in TIMI 0 vs. 5.9% in TIMI 3, log-rank P = 0.161) and MACCE (14.1% vs. 13.7%, log-rank P = 0.931) between the two groups. In a Cox time-to-event multivariable model with preprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 as the reference, the preprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 was not independently associated with mortality or MACCE.Conclusion: In a nationwide prospective Korean registry, total coronary occlusion before PCI was not associated with worse clinical outcomes at 3 years in patients with STEMI and single-vessel disease when treated with primary PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: