Why the study?
Is portable echocardiography alone more cost-effective than ECG or NT-proBNP followed by echocardiography for detecting cardiac abnormalities in patients with suspected heart failure?
Is portable echocardiography alone more cost-effective than ECG or NT-proBNP followed by echocardiography for detecting cardiac abnormalities in patients with suspected heart failure?
Portable echocardiography alone is a more cost-effective initial strategy than ECG or NT-proBNP for detecting cardiac abnormalities in community patients with suspected heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports portable echocardiography as potentially cost-effective initial test in suspected HF; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Lim et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: