Why the study?
Heart failure causes reduced respiratory and peripheral muscle strength and endurance, leading to fatigue and exercise intolerance. This review assessed whether inspiratory muscle training added to conventional training enhances respiratory muscle function and functional capacity in heart failure.
Does inspiratory muscle training associated with conventional training improve inspiratory muscle strength, endurance, and functional capacity in patients with heart failure?
Does inspiratory muscle training associated with conventional training improve inspiratory muscle strength, endurance, and functional capacity in patients with heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adding inspiratory muscle training to conventional training improves respiratory muscle strength, endurance, and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure.
Heart failure (HF) is one of the most prevalent diseases in the world and is characterized as a complex clinical syndrome. It is a disease that affects both the peripheral muscles and the respiratory muscles, causing damage such as reduced strength and endurance. One of the main symptoms is fatigue and exercise intolerance. The aim of this review article is to assess whether the use of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) associated with conventional training enhances inspiratory muscle strength (PImax) and inspiratory muscle endurance (SPImax) and functional capacity in patients with HF. Methods: A literature review was carried out on the use of IMT in patients, including 6 randomized clinical trials, searched in the PubMed, PEDro and Lilacs databases. Results: There is evidence showing an increase in PImax and SPImax with the addition of IMT to training; in addition, an improvement in VO2 peak, circulatory power and ventilatory efficiency. Conclusion: The use of IMT associated with conventional training is an interesting strategy for boosting gains in strength and inspiratory muscle endurance, increasing exercise tolerance and consequently improving patients' quality of life. However, more studies are needed in order to more clearly define the selection criteria and methodology for applying IMT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavegn et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: