Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study examines the impact of adverse social conditions on breast cancer survivors, suggesting a need for better support.
e12745 Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH), including housing instability, food insecurity, and socioeconomic challenges, are increasingly recognized as modulators of cancer outcomes. However, their long-term effects on breast cancer survivors remain underexplored. This study examines associations between adverse SDOH and clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients using real-world data. Methods: Utilizing the TriNetX federated network, we conducted a retrospective analysis to compare outcomes on adult breast cancer patients (ICD-10-CM: C50) from 88 healthcare organizations. Cohort A (Breast_SDOH; n = 21,947) comprised patients with documented adverse SDOH (e.g., homelessness [Z59.0], food insecurity [Z59.41]), while Cohort B (Breast_nonSDOH; n = 1,031,237) excluded such factors. Propensity score matching (1:1) balanced cohorts (n = 21,184 each) on demographics, comorbidities, and BMI. Outcomes assessed starting 1-day post-index event (first breast cancer or SDOH diagnosis), included mortality, severe sepsis, lymphedema, pain, malaise/fatigue, memory loss, and angiosarcoma. Analyses included measures of association, Kaplan-Meier survival, and instance counts, with statistical significance at p < 0.05. Results: Adverse SDOH were associated with significantly higher risks and hazards for several outcomes. Mortality risk was elevated (15.9% vs. 13.4%; risk ratio [RR] 1.186, 95% CI 1.132-1.243; p < 0.001), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.849 (95% CI 1.755-1.948; p < 0.001). Severe sepsis showed increased risk (4.5% vs. 3.6%; RR 1.248, 95% CI 1.134-1.373; p < 0.001; HR 1.872, 95% CI 1.695-2.068; p < 0.001). Malaise and fatigue (23.1% vs. 22.0%; RR 1.048, 95% CI 1.001-1.097; p = 0.047; HR 1.520, 95% CI 1.441-1.603; p < 0.001) and memory loss (13.5% vs. 11.7%; RR 1.161, 95% CI 1.099-1.228; p < 0.001; HR 1.895, 95% CI 1.783-2.014; p < 0.001) were also more prevalent. Conversely, lymphedema (5.9% vs. 8.3%; RR 0.713, 95% CI 0.663-0.768; p < 0.001) and angiosarcoma (19.1% vs. 38.4%; RR 0.497, 95% CI 0.475-0.521; p < 0.001; HR 0.505, 95% CI 0.479-0.532; p < 0.001) risks were lower, potentially reflecting differential healthcare access or documentation biases. Pain exhibited mixed findings, with marginally lower risk (19.3% vs. 20.4%; RR 0.944, 95% CI 0.899-0.991; p = 0.021) but higher hazard (HR 1.508, 95% CI 1.426-1.594; p < 0.001), suggesting accelerated onset in the SDOH group. Conclusions: Adverse SDOH exacerbate long-term risks of mortality, sepsis, and neurocognitive symptoms in breast cancer survivors, underscoring the need for integrated social support interventions. Lower risks for certain treatment-related outcomes may indicate barriers to care or underreporting. These findings call for SDOH screening and mitigation strategies in oncology to improve equitable outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kavcic et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: