Why the study?
Does active site-blocked activated factor VII reduce infarct size and no-reflow area in a rabbit model of ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Does active site-blocked activated factor VII reduce infarct size and no-reflow area in a rabbit model of ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Tissue factor-mediated activation of the extrinsic coagulation pathway contributes to myocardial injury during postischemic reperfusion, and blocking it reduces infarct size in a rabbit model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FVIIai may attenuate reperfusion injury in rabbits; leaves open whether tissue factor inhibition improves outcomes in human STEMI.
Oxygen free radicals induce de novo synthesis of tissue factor (TF), the initiator of the extrinsic pathway of coagulation, within the coronary vasculature during postischemic reperfusion. In the present study we wanted to assess whether TF expression might cause myocardial injury during postischemic reperfusion. Anesthetized rabbits underwent 30 min of coronary occlusion followed by 5.5 h of reperfusion. At reperfusion the animals received 1) saline (n = 8), 2) human recombinant, active site-blocked activated factor VII (FVIIai, 1 mg/kg, n = 8), or 3) human recombinant activated FVII (FVIIa, 1 mg/kg, n = 8). FVIIai binds to TF as native FVII, but with the active site blocked it inhibits TF procoagulant activity. The area at risk of infarction (AR), the infarct size (IS), and the no-reflow area (NR) were determined at the end of the experiment. FVIIai resulted in a significant reduction in IS and NR with respect to control animals (28.1 +/- 11.3 and 11.1 +/- 6.1% of AR vs. 59.8 +/- 12.8 and 24.4 +/- 2.7% of AR, respectively, P < 0.01), whereas FVIIa resulted in a significant increase in IS and NR to 80.1 +/- 13. 1 and 61.9 +/- 13.8% of AR, respectively (P < 0.01). In conclusion, TF-mediated activation of the extrinsic coagulation pathway makes an important contribution to myocardial injury during postischemic reperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golino et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: