Why the study?
What is the diagnostic yield and variation of CTPA for pulmonary embolism in Australasian Emergency Departments?
What is the diagnostic yield and variation of CTPA for pulmonary embolism in Australasian Emergency Departments?
In Australasian EDs, CTPA yield for PE is 14.6% with significant inter-site variation, and higher utilization correlates with more PE diagnoses without increasing the proportion of sub-segmental PE.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Significant inter-site CTPA yield variation may signal inconsistent ED practices; leaves open need for standardized utilization benchmarks.
INTRODUCTION: Overuse of CT Pulmonary Angiograms (CTPA) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE), particularly in Emergency Departments (ED), is considered problematic. Marked variations in positive CTPA rates are reported, with American 4-10% yields driving most concerns. Higher resolution CTPA may increase sub-segmental PE (SSPE) diagnoses, which may be up to 40% false positive. Excessive use and false positives could increase harm vs. benefit. These issues have not been systematically examined outside America. AIMS: To describe current yield variation and CTPA utilisation in Australasian ED, exploring potential factors correlated with variation. METHODS: A retrospective multi-centre review of consecutive ED-ordered CTPA using standard radiology reports. ED CTPA report data were inputted onto preformatted data-sheets. The primary outcome was site level yield, analysed both intra-site and against a nominated 15.3% yield. Factors potentially associated with yield were assessed for correlation. RESULTS: Fourteen radiology departments (15 ED) provided 7077 CTPA data (94% ≥64-slice CT); PE were reported in 1028 (yield 14.6% (95%CI 13.8-15.4%; range 9.3-25.3%; site variation p <0.0001) with four sites significantly below and one above the 15.3% target. Admissions, CTPA usage, PE diagnosis rates and size of PE were uncorrelated with yield. Large PE (≥lobar) were 55% (CI: 52.1-58.2%) and SSPE 8.8% (CI: 7.1-10.5%) of positive scans. CTPA usage (0.2-1.5% adult attendances) was correlated (p<0.006) with PE diagnosis but not SSPE: large PE proportions. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSIONS: We found significant intra-site CTPA yield variation within Australasia. Yield was not clearly correlated with CTPA usage or increased small PE rates. Both SSPE and large PE rates were similar to higher yield historical cohorts. CTPA use was considerably below USA 2.5-3% rates. Higher CTPA utilisation was positively correlated with PE diagnoses, but without evidence of increased proportions of small PE. This suggests that increased diagnoses seem to be of clinically relevant sized PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mountain et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: