There is a high prevalence of hypertension in both urban and rural Tanzania, accompanied by alarmingly low rates of awareness, treatment, and control.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low awareness/control rates signal need for better detection in Tanzania; leaves open effective interventions for similar low-resource settings.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence, detection, treatment and control of hypertension in an urban and rural area of Tanzania. DESIGN: Two linked cross-sectional population-based surveys. SETTING: A middle-income urban district of Dar es Salaam (Ilala) and a village in the relatively prosperous rural area of Kilimanjaro (Shari). PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred and seventy adults (> 15 years) in Ilala and 928 adults in Shari were studied. RESULTS: Hypertension prevalence (blood pressure > or = 140 and/or 90 mmHg, or known hypertensives receiving anti-hypertensive treatment) was 30% (95% confidence interval, 25.1-34.9%) in men and 28.6% (24.3-32.9%) in women in Ilala, and 32.2% (27.7-36.7%) in men and 31.5% (27.8-35.2%) in women in Shari. Age-standardized hypertension (to the New World Population) prevalence was 37.3% (32.2-42.5%) among men and 39.1% (34.2-44.0%) in women in Ilala, and 26.3% (22.4-30.4%) in men and 27.4% (24A-30.4%) in women in Shari. In both areas, just under 20% of hypertensive subjects were aware of their diagnosis, approximately 10% reported receiving treatment and less than 1% were controlled (blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg). Hypertensive subjects were older, had greater body mass indices and waist: hip ratios, and had more risk factors for hypertension and its complications (smoking, heavy alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, obesity and diabetes) than non-hypertensives. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of hypertension in rural and urban areas of Tanzania, with low levels of detection, treatment and control. This demonstrates the need for cost-effective strategies for primary prevention, detection and treatment of hypertension and the growing public health challenge of non-communicable diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edwards et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: