Why the study?
Do acetylstrophanthidin and glucagon have contrasting effects on hemodynamics and regurgitant flow in sedated dogs with aortic regurgitation?
Do acetylstrophanthidin and glucagon have contrasting effects on hemodynamics and regurgitant flow in sedated dogs with aortic regurgitation?
In a canine model of aortic regurgitation, glucagon reduced left ventricular volume overload and increased cardiac output, whereas acetylstrophanthidin increased aortic regurgitation and left ventricular volume overload without increasing cardiac output.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not change aortic regurgitation management; leaves open translation of glucagon effects beyond canine models.
The hemodynamic and phasic ascending aortic flow changes induced by acetylstrophanthidin and glucagon were studied in closed-chest sedated dogs with aortic regurgitation. While the positive inotropic effect of both agents was reflected in an increase in peak rate of rise of left ventricular pressure, acetylstrophanthidin increased aortic regurgitation, while glucagon decreased it. With the former, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure rose from 20+/-6 to 27+/-6 mm Hg (P < 0.005), but fell from 18+/-4 to 11+/-3 mm Hg (P < 0.001) with glucagon. Acetylstrophanthidin increased systemic vascular resistance, aortic diastolic pressure, and diastolic regurgitant flow rate, and, heart rate and the duration of regurgitation per beat and per minute being unchanged, regurgitant flow per beat increased 32+/-15% (P < 0.001). Glucagon decreased regurgitant flow per beat 27+/-14% (P < 0.001) because of abbreviation of diastole associated with tachycardia, and because of reduction in regurgitant flow rate. Despite tachycardia, the duration of regurgitation per minute was unchanged, and the small fall in regurgitant blood flow per minute was not significant, but this pertained in the face of 47% increase in effective cardiac output (P < 0.001). In contrast, acetylstrophanthidin increased regurgitant flow per minute 28+/-14% (P < 0.001) without change in effective cardiac output. The increase in cardiac contractility, tachycardia, and systemic vasodilatation induced by glucagon preferentially enhanced forward blood flow, which led to reduction in left ventricular volume overload, while it increased cardiac output. Contrarily, acetylstrophanthidin increased aortic regurgitation and, despite its inotropic effect, increased left ventricular volume overload without an increase in cardiac output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hopkins et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: