Why the study?
Both CKD and HPR predict MACE after PCI, but the impact of HPR on clinical outcomes among patients on hemodialysis was unclear.
Does hemodialysis status and high on-treatment platelet reactivity impact 2-year clinical outcomes after PCI?
Does hemodialysis status and high on-treatment platelet reactivity impact 2-year clinical outcomes after PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hemodialysis and high on-treatment platelet reactivity are independently associated with adverse outcomes after PCI, but the negative impact of hemodialysis is present regardless of platelet reactivity.
OBJECTIVES We sought to compare clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients on versus not on hemodialysis (HD) and examine whether high on‐treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) further impacts outcomes among patients on HD. BACKGROUND Both chronic kidney disease (CKD) and HPR are predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after PCI. METHODS Two‐year outcomes of patients from the prospective, multicenter ADAPT‐DES study ( N = 8,582) were analyzed according to HD status at enrollment. All patients underwent platelet function testing with the VerifyNow assay; HPR on clopidogrel was defined as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) >208. RESULTS Compared with non‐HD patients, patients on HD ( n = 85) had significantly higher baseline PRU (median 254 vs. 188, p = .001) and more frequently had HPR (61.7% vs. 42.5%, p < .001). HD was associated with increased 2‐year rates of MACE (death, myocardial infarction (MI) or definite stent thrombosis (ST); 23.4% vs. 10.7%, p < .001). HD was also strongly associated with 2‐year overall mortality, cardiac death, MI, target vessel revascularization, major bleeding, stroke and ST. Following adjustment for HPR and other covariates, HD was independently associated with overall mortality, MI, ST, and major bleeding at 2 years. The relationship between HD status and 2‐year MACE was consistent in patients with and without HPR ( P interaction = .78). CONCLUSIONS Nearly two‐thirds of patients on HD exhibited HPR on clopidogrel, and both HD and HPR were independently associated with 2‐year adverse outcomes after DES implantation. However, the deleterious impact of HD on clinical outcomes was present in both patients with and without HPR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rubin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: