Key result
High platelet reactivity on aspirin (HR 1.844) and clopidogrel (HR 1.680) independently predicted an increased risk of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 2 years following drug-eluting stent implantation.
Why the study?
Does high platelet reactivity on aspirin or clopidogrel increase the risk of stent thrombosis and MACCE in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents?
Cohort (n=1,331)
Single-blind
No
Does high platelet reactivity on aspirin or clopidogrel increase the risk of stent thrombosis and MACCE in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents?
Hazard Ratio: 1.844 (95% CI 1.348–2.522)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.9% vs 0.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
High platelet reactivity on aspirin or clopidogrel, as measured by a novel automatic platelet aggregometer, is an independent predictor of 2-year stent thrombosis and MACCE following DES implantation.
HPR on aspirin or clopidogrel was associated with higher stent thrombosis after DES PCI; hypothesis-generating for reactivity testing, does not support practice change.
BACKGROUND: The association of platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes, especially stent thrombosis, was not so clear. We sought to investigate whether high platelet reactivity affects clinical outcomes of patients with drug eluting stents (DESs) implantation. METHODS: All enrolled individuals treated with DESs implantation were evaluated by PL-11, using sequentially platelet counting method. The primary end point was the occurrence of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 2 years. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and ischemic stroke. RESULTS: A total of 1331consecutive patients were enrolled at our center. There were 91 patients (6.8 %) identified with high platelet reactivity (HPR) on aspirin, and 437 patients (32.9 %) with HPR on clopidogrel. At 2-year follow-up, the incidence of stent thrombosis was significantly higher in patients with HPR on aspirin (9.9 % vs. 0.4 %, p < 0.001), and HPR on clopidogrel (3.0 % vs. 0.1 %, p < 0.001). There were increased MACCE in the HPR on aspirin group (16.5 % vs. 8.5 %, p = 0.021), mainly driven by the higher all cause death (7.7 % vs. 1.6 %, p = 0.002) and MI (9.9 % vs. 1.9 %, p < 0.001) in the HPR on aspirin group. Similarly, the rate of MACCE was higher in the HPR on clopidogrel group (12.4 % vs. 7.4 %, p = 0.004). No differences in all bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that high platelet reactivity on both aspirin and clopidogrel were associated with incremental stent thrombosis following DESs implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (n=1,331). High platelet reactivity on aspirin vs. Normal platelet reactivity on aspirin was evaluated on Definite and probable stent thrombosis at 2 years (HR 1.844, 95% CI 1.348-2.522, p=<0.001). High platelet reactivity on aspirin (HR 1.844) and clopidogrel (HR 1.680) independently predicted an increased risk of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 2 years following drug-eluting stent implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: