Why the study?
Does essential hypertension impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine and bradykinin compared to normotensive controls?
Does essential hypertension impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine and bradykinin compared to normotensive controls?
Patients with essential hypertension exhibit a generalized impairment in endothelium-dependent vasodilation that is not restricted to a single intracellular signal-transduction pathway.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Essential hypertension was associated with impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation; supports generalized endothelial dysfunction and leaves open causal direction.
BACKGROUND: Patients with essential hypertension have abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation, largely related to reduced bioactivity of nitric oxide (NO). The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether this defect is due to a deficit at the specific intracellular signal-transduction pathway level or is a consequence of a more generalized endothelial abnormality. METHODS AND RESULTS: The responses of the forearm vasculature to acetylcholine and bradykinin (endothelium-dependent agents that act through different signal transduction pathways) and to sodium nitroprusside (a direct dilator of vascular smooth muscle) were studied in 10 hypertensive patients (5 men, 5 women; aged 48 +/- 9 years old [mean +/- SD]) and 12 control subjects (6 men, 6 women; aged 48 +/- 7 years old). To determine the contribution of NO to bradykinin-induced vasodilation, the vascular responses to bradykinin were also measured after administration of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, an arginine analogue that inhibits the synthesis of NO. Drugs were infused into the brachial artery, and forearm blood flow was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography. The response to acetylcholine was significantly blunted in hypertensive patients (maximal blood flow, 7.5 +/- 2 versus 16.6 +/- 8 mL.min-1.100 mL-1 in control subjects [mean +/- SD]; P < .005). Similarly, the vasodilator effect of bradykinin was significantly reduced in hypertensive patients compared with control subjects (maximal blood flow, 8.7 +/- 2 versus 15.8 +/- 6 mL.min-1.100 mL-1 in control subjects; P < .005). A significant correlation was found between the maximal blood flow with acetylcholine and that with bradykinin (r = .89). No significant differences were found between the two groups for vascular response to sodium nitroprusside. NG-monomethyl-L-arginine significantly blunted the response to bradykinin in control subjects (maximal blood flow decreased from 15.8 +/- 6 to 10.1 +/- 2 mL.min-1.100 mL-1, P < .003). In contrast, inhibition of NO synthesis did not modify the response to bradykinin in hypertensive patients (maximal blood flow, 8.7 +/- 2 and 8.5 +/- 3 before and during infusion of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, respectively; P = NS). As a consequence, the response to bradykinin after inhibition of NO synthesis was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with essential hypertension have impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilator responses to both acetylcholine and bradykinin. These findings indicate that the endothelial dysfunction in this condition is not related to a specific defect of a single intracellular signal-transduction pathway and suggest a more generalized abnormality of endothelial vasodilator function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panza et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: