Key result
In a pig model of acute myocardial ischemia, pinacidil induced ventricular fibrillation in 100% of treated animals at a lesser rise in extracellular potassium and lesser fall in pH.
Why the study?
Does verapamil or pinacidil alter extracellular K+, pH, and the incidence of ventricular fibrillation during acute myocardial ischemia in a pig model?
Does verapamil or pinacidil alter extracellular K+, pH, and the incidence of ventricular fibrillation during acute myocardial ischemia in a pig model?
In a pig model of acute myocardial ischemia, the ATP-sensitive K+ channel opener pinacidil promoted ventricular fibrillation at lesser extracellular K+ rises and pH falls, whereas verapamil delayed these ionic changes and prevented VF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pinacidil promotes VF in ischemic pig myocardium at milder ionic shifts; leaves open relevance of KATP modulation to human arrhythmia prevention.
Ca++-channel antagonist verapamil and ATP-sensitive K+-channel opener pinacidil are known to decrease the rise in extracellular K+ ([K+]e) level and pH (pHe) that occurs during reversible acute myocardial ischemia and to lessen the accompanying activation delay. Verapamil is also known to decrease the incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/fibrillation (VF) during acute myocardial ischemia; however, the effects of ATP-sensitive K+-channel opener on the incidence of VT/VF are controversial. We studied, in an in vivo pig model, the effects of verapamil and pinacidil on the changes in [K+]e level and pHe, local activation, and the incidence of VT/VF during 60 minutes of ischemia. Thirty-one pigs were divided into 2 groups: a verapamil group (9 control pigs and 8 verapamil-treated pigs) and pinacidil group (5 control pigs and 9 pinacidil-treated pigs). In the verapamil group, VF developed in 1 of the 9 control pigs, whereas no VF developed in 8 verapamil-treated pigs. In the pinacidil group, VF developed in 3 of the 5 control pigs and all 9 pinacidil-treated pigs. Under verapamil treatment (versus the control condition), onset of the second rise in [K+]e level was delayed, and the maximum rise in [K+]e level was decreased. Under pinacidil treatment (versus the control condition), time to the onset of VT/VF was shorter than that under the control condition, and VT/VF developed at lower [K+]e level and higher pHe. In conclusion, VF may develop at a lesser [K+]e rise and pHe fall in the presence of pinacidil during acute myocardial ischemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2018) studied Acute myocardial ischemia (n=31). Verapamil and Pinacidil vs. Control (no drug or 5% ethanol placebo) was evaluated on Incidence of ventricular fibrillation (pinacidil vs control) (p=0.110). In a pig model of acute myocardial ischemia, pinacidil induced ventricular fibrillation in 100% of treated animals at a lesser rise in extracellular potassium and lesser fall in pH.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: