Why the study?
Does pinacidil alter the rise in extracellular potassium during ischemia in pig and rabbit heart models?
Does pinacidil alter the rise in extracellular potassium during ischemia in pig and rabbit heart models?
Pinacidil lessens the rise in extracellular potassium during ischemia, reflecting a complex balance of its effects on potassium conductance, driving force, and metabolic effects.
Complex K+ dynamics during ischemia in animal hearts; leaves open any clinical relevance to arrhythmia prevention.
BACKGROUND: The efflux of potassium (K) through the ATP-sensitive K channel is considered an important cause of the rise in extracellular K ([K+]e) during no-flow ischemia. We postulated that agents that enhance K conductance in this channel would enhance the rise in [K+]e. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the effects of 10 and 25 mumol/L pinacidil, and ATP-sensitive K channel opener that provides metabolic protection to the ischemic myocardium, on the rise in [K+]e recorded by K-sensitive electrodes, the change in action potential duration (APD) recorded by microelectrodes, and the changes in activation during ischemia in in situ pig hearts and Tyrode-perfused rabbit interventricular septa. Pinacidil 25 mumol/L unexpectedly lessened the rise in [K+]e and the activation delay in both preparations. Pinacidil 10 mumol/L had no effect in the rabbit and only a slight effect in the pig. Both concentrations significantly exaggerated the APD shortening induced by ischemia. By varying stimulation frequency, we demonstrated that the rise in [K+]e during ischemia, both before and after pinacidil, correlated with the time that the action potential was at its plateau voltage. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the rise in [K+]e during ischemia is due to multiple factors, including K conductance across membrane channels, K driving force as reflected by the time that the action potential is at its plateau voltage, and the metabolic effects of ischemia. The unanticipated lessening of the rise in [K+]e by pinacidil reflects the balance of its effects on these several parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanda et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: