Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative approaches to evaluation have recently attained legitimacy. Now it's time to advance their influence. Towards that end, this discussion offers a self-reflective critique of four critical issues in qualitative evaluation: relativism, theory and generalization, warrant and inquiry criteria, and positioning. Refractions from this critique embolden a recentering of qualitative evaluation around its socio-political value dimensions and a concomitant assumption of the rights and responsibilities of scientist citizens. These refractions further challenge the remainder of the evaluation community to do the same.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jennifer C. Greene (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: