Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
On the basis of cell surface markers, mature T cells are considered to have either a naïve or a memory phenotype. These cells exhibit distinct types of kinetic behaviour in vivo. While naïve-phenotype cells persist long term in a non-dividing state, memory-phenotype T cells include cycling cells and exhibit a more rapid rate of turnover; this has also been shown to be true for cells that can be definitively identified as naïve or memory T cells respectively. The number of memory-phenotype (CD44hi) CD8+ T cells entering cell cycle is greatly increased after in vivo exposure to viruses, bacteria or components of bacteria. Accelerated turnover of memory T cells also occurs after the injection of a variety cytokines that are induced by infectious agents, including type I interferon (IFN-I). Although naïve-phenotype T cells do not divide in response to these cytokines, they do exhibit signs of activation, including upregulation of CD69 after exposure to IFN-I. These findings suggest that the dissimilar in vivo kinetics of naïve- and memory-phenotype T cells might reflect their divergent responses to cytokines. Furthermore, the ability of infection-induced cytokines to stimulate non-specific proliferation of memory-phenotype T cells and partial activation of naïve-phenotype T cells implies that they play a complex role during primary immune responses to infectious agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tough et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: