Key result
Previous PCI before CABG was associated with a significantly higher rate of in-hospital major adverse events compared to no previous PCI (15.8% vs. 2.5%; OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.71; p=0.01).
Why the study?
Does previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increase the risk of early in-hospital adverse events in patients undergoing subsequent isolated elective on-pump CABG?
Cohort (n=160)
No
Does previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increase the risk of early in-hospital adverse events in patients undergoing subsequent isolated elective on-pump CABG?
A history of prior PCI is associated with a significantly increased risk of early in-hospital major adverse events following subsequent elective on-pump CABG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prior PCI may elevate in-hospital adverse event risk after elective CABG; leaves open causal confirmation and risk-stratification impact.
BACKGROUND: A previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may affect the outcomes of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The objective of this study was to compare the early in-hospital postoperative outcomes between patients who underwent CABG with or without previous PCI. METHODS: The present study included 160 patients who underwent isolated elective on-pump CABG at the department of cardiothoracic surgery, Minia University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2014. Patients who previously underwent PCI (n=38) were compared to patients who did not (n=122). Preoperative, operative, and early in-hospital postoperative data were analyzed. The end points of the study were in-hospital mortality and postoperative major adverse events. RESULTS: Non-significant differences were found between the study groups regarding preoperative demographic data, risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, EuroSCORE, the presence of left main disease, reoperation for bleeding, postoperative acute myocardial infarction, a neurological deficit, need for renal dialysis, hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. The average time from PCI to CABG was 13.9±5.4 years. The previous PCI group exhibited a significantly larger proportion of patients who experienced in-hospital major adverse events (15.8% vs. 2.5%, p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, only previous PCI was found to be a significant predictor of major adverse events (odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.71; p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Previous PCI was found to have a significant effect on the incidence of early major adverse events after CABG. Further large-scale and long-term studies are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamal et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring CABG (n=160). Previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. No previous PCI was evaluated on In-hospital mortality and postoperative major adverse events (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.71, p=0.01). Previous PCI before CABG was associated with a significantly higher rate of in-hospital major adverse events compared to no previous PCI (15.8% vs. 2.5%; OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.71; p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: