Key result
In a propensity-matched cohort of 261 patients, previous percutaneous coronary intervention did not significantly influence mortality at 30 days, 1 year, or 5 years following CABG surgery.
Why the study?
Studies assessing the influence of prior PCI on mortality and morbidity following CABG have yielded conflicting results.
Does previous percutaneous coronary intervention influence mortality and morbidity outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Cohort (n=3,007)
Does previous percutaneous coronary intervention influence mortality and morbidity outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention does not significantly worsen mortality outcomes in patients subsequently undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasingly performed to treat coronary artery disease. The performance of multiple PCI has also been increasing. Consequently, the percentage of patients presenting for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is reported to vary from 13 to 40%. The influence of previous PCI on CABG outcomes has been studied in single center, regional studies, registries and meta-analyses. Some reports showed a negative effect on mortality and morbidity in early or long-term follow-up, but others did not find this influence. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 3007 patients consecutively operated for CABG, 261 of them with previous PCI, were included in this analysis. Comparison of the groups "previous PCI" and "primary CABG" was made in the original cohort and in a propensity score matched cohort of 261 patients. There were some differences in preoperative clinical characteristics in both types of cohort, even in the matched one. Outcomes were compared at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years of follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality in any period or cohort. There were some differences in other outcomes as readmission and composite events, including cardiovascular death at 1 and 5 years of follow-up. These differences, neverthless, were not confirmed in comparison with the matched cohort. CONCLUSION: Although there are some limitations in this study, it was not found consistent negative influence of previous PCI on CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miguel et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring CABG (n=3,007). Previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Primary CABG (no previous PCI) was evaluated on Mortality at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years. In a propensity-matched cohort of 261 patients, previous percutaneous coronary intervention did not significantly influence mortality at 30 days, 1 year, or 5 years following CABG surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: