Key result
2D speckle tracking echocardiography identified specific LV contraction processes, with apical-to-basal differences of 107±30ms in LBBB, 133±46ms in RVA pacing, and 37±20ms in LV pacing.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether longitudinal strain from two-dimensional echocardiography reflects the contraction process in patients with asynchronous left ventricular activation.
Does two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography identify specific left ventricular activation sequences in heart failure patients with asynchronous LV activation?
Cross-Sectional (n=144)
No
Does two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography identify specific left ventricular activation sequences in heart failure patients with asynchronous LV activation?
Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography can effectively estimate left ventricular activation sequences and differentiate contraction patterns among heart failure patients with LBBB, right ventricular pacing, and left ventricular pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Speckle tracking may characterize LV activation patterns in dyssynchronous HF; hypothesis-generating for CRT optimization, pending prospective trials.
Evaluation of longitudinal strain (LS) from two-dimensional echocardiography is useful for global and regional left ventricular (LV) dysfunction assessment. We determined whether the LS reflects contraction process in patients with asynchronous LV activation. We studied 144 patients with an ejection fraction ≤ 35%, who had left bundle branch block (LBBB, n = 42), right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing (n = 34), LV basal- or mid-lateral pacing (n = 23), and no conduction block (Narrow-QRS, n = 45). LS distribution maps were constructed using 3 standard apical views. The times from the QRS onset-to-early systolic positive peak (Q-EPpeak) and late systolic negative peak (Q-LNpeak) were measured to determine the beginning and end of contractions in each segment. Negative strain in LBBB initially appeared in the septum and basal-lateral contracted late. In RVA and LV pacing, the contracted area enlarged centrifugally from the pacing site. Narrow-QRS showed few regional differences in strain during the systolic period. The Q-EPpeak and Q-LNpeak exhibited similar sequences characterized by septum to basal-lateral via the apical regions in LBBB, apical to basal regions in RVA pacing, and lateral to a relatively large delayed contracted area between the apical- and basal-septum in LV pacing. Differences in Q-LNpeaks between the apical and basal segments in delayed contracted wall were 107 ± 30 ms in LBBB, 133 ± 46 ms in RVA pacing, and 37 ± 20 ms in LV pacing (p < 0.05, between QRS groups). Specific LV contraction processes were demonstrated by evaluating the LS distribution and time-to-peak strain. These evaluations may have potential to estimate the activation sequence in patients with asynchronous LV activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hara et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=144). Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography vs. Comparison among QRS morphologies (LBBB, RVA pacing, LV pacing, Narrow-QRS) was evaluated on Differences in Q-LNpeaks between the apical and basal segments in delayed contracted wall (apical-to-basal difference) (p=<0.05). 2D speckle tracking echocardiography identified specific LV contraction processes, with apical-to-basal differences of 107±30ms in LBBB, 133±46ms in RVA pacing, and 37±20ms in LV pacing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: