Why the study?
Does cisapride increase HR, QT, and QTc intervals in ESRD patients receiving haemodialysis?
Does cisapride increase HR, QT, and QTc intervals in ESRD patients receiving haemodialysis?
Cisapride does not appear to significantly prolong QT or QTc intervals overall in ESRD patients on haemodialysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cisapride was not associated with QTc changes in hemodialysis; leaves open arrhythmia risk assessment in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: This study involves a retrospective in-patient chart review of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving haemodialysis to observe if cisapride significantly increases heart rate (HR), QT, and corrected QT (QTc) intervals on 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). METHODS: Medical records for 23 patients who were being treated with chronic maintenance haemodialysis and had >/=2 ECGs while on cisapride and >/=2 ECGs while off cisapride were obtained and reviewed. HR, QT, and QTc on all 12-lead ECGs, reason for admission, and past medical history were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 529 ECGs (279 on/250 off cisapride) for 23 patients were included. The results, as calculated by each patient's individual averages (n=23), on vs off cisapride respectively, were HR, 88+/-14 vs 84+/-17 beats/min (P:=0.18); QT, 373+/-39 vs 382+/-45 ms (P:=0.24); and QTc, 443+/-27 vs 441+/-21 ms (P:=0.39). No significant difference was found in the number of admissions per month while on or off cisapride. No patient had an average QTc on or off cisapride that was >500 ms. One patient died from ventricular arrhythmia 12 days after discontinuing cisapride. The patient's QTc was significantly longer on vs off cisapride (487 vs 462 ms, P:=0. 007); however, this patient had an extensive cardiac history and multiple syncopal episodes prior to the use of cisapride. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant overall difference in HR, QT, and QTc interval or admissions/month on vs off cisapride in ESRD patients receiving haemodialysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hentges et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: