Key result
Intravenous sildenafil reduced infarct size compared to control in non-diabetic dogs, but this cardioprotective effect was completely abolished in the presence of diabetes.
Why the study?
Does intravenous sildenafil reduce infarct size in a canine model of ischemia-reperfusion, and is this effect attenuated by diabetes?
RCT (n=38)
Randomized
Does intravenous sildenafil reduce infarct size in a canine model of ischemia-reperfusion, and is this effect attenuated by diabetes?
Diabetes abolishes the cardioprotective effect of sildenafil against ischemia-reperfusion injury in a canine model, likely by impairing PKG-I signaling.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diabetes abolishes sildenafil cardioprotection in this model; hypothesis-generating for diabetic patients and requires clinical confirmation.
The selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor sildenafil has been demonstrated to produce cardioprotection; however, diabetes is known to abolish cardioprotective signaling. We tested the hypothesis that sildenafil-induced cGMP-dependent protein kinase-I (PKG-I) expression and cardioprotection are attenuated by diabetes. Barbiturate-anesthetized dogs (n = 38) were instrumented for measurement of hemodynamics and subjected to 60-minute occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery and 3-hour reperfusion. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive 0.9% saline (control) or intravenous sildenafil (0.7 or 1.4 mg/kg) in the absence or presence of diabetes (3 weeks after administration of alloxan and streptozotocin). No differences in hemodynamics or coronary collateral blood flow (radioactive microspheres) were observed between groups before and during ischemia and reperfusion, except that infusion of sildenafil produced transient decreases in left ventricle systolic pressure. Sildenafil significantly (P < 0.05) reduced infarct size (16 +/- 2% of the left ventricular area at risk; triphenyltetrazolium staining) as compared to control (31 +/- 39%). Diabetes alone did not alter infarct size (31 +/- 2%) but abolished the protective effect of sildenafil (0.7 mg/kg: 26 +/- 3%; 1.4 mg/kg: 26 +/- 3%). Sildenafil increased PKG-I expression (immunohistochemistry and Western blotting) in the absence but not the presence of diabetes. The results indicate that diabetes abolishes cardioprotection by sildenafil and implicates PKG-I in the signal transduction pathway activated by this drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamnicki-Abegg et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury and diabetes (n=38). Intravenous sildenafil vs. 0.9% saline (control) was evaluated on Infarct size (% of the left ventricular area at risk) (p=< 0.05). Intravenous sildenafil reduced infarct size compared to control in non-diabetic dogs, but this cardioprotective effect was completely abolished in the presence of diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: