Key result
Complementary and alternative medicine shows promising outcomes in heart failure, but large-scale randomized trials are needed to support evidence-based decision making.
Why the study?
A gap exists between the literature on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine and the clinical application of knowledge to make confident recommendations for heart failure.
Do complementary and alternative medicine supplements improve outcomes or reduce side effects in patients with heart failure?
Do complementary and alternative medicine supplements improve outcomes or reduce side effects in patients with heart failure?
While there are promising outcomes for the use of supplements in heart failure, large-scale randomized trials are needed to support their integration into evidence-based management.
INTRODUCTION: Complementary, alternative and integrative medicine includes a myriad of therapies including herbal medicines, vitamins, dietary interventions and more, that are taken alone or in adjunct to standard conventional treatment. Often the main goals are to slow progression of disease, increase effectiveness of a drug, reduce side effects and improve quality of life. The study of these therapies and their influence in heart failure is not new. However, even for an experienced clinician, a gap exists between the literature and the application of knowledge to make a confident recommendation. AREAS COVERED: This review has a focus on specific supplements that are commonly used for individuals with HF. It discusses the mechanism of action, expected benefits, potential adverse effects, suggested doses, forms and drug interactions of these therapies. The literature search methodology included using medical subject headings terms to search in PubMed. Articles used were screened and critically appraised by the authors of this review. EXPERT OPINION: There are promising outcomes pertaining to the use of CAM in patients with HF. Advances in large scale, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are necessary to support evidence-based decision making regarding the use of supplements in conjunction, and in comparison, to conventional therapies for heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raddysh et al. (2021) conducted a review in Heart failure. Complementary, alternative and integrative medicine (supplements) vs. Conventional therapies was evaluated. Complementary and alternative medicine shows promising outcomes in heart failure, but large-scale randomized trials are needed to support evidence-based decision making.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: