Key result
Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction is reviewed to assess its utility and validity based on contemporary data.
Why the study?
Does thrombus aspiration improve outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does thrombus aspiration improve outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
This review summarizes contemporary data on the utility of thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.
Contemporary review leaves thrombus aspiration utility unresolved in AMI primary PCI; leaves open need for targeted randomized trials.
The pathogenesis that underlies acute myocardial infarction is complex and multifactorial. One of the most important components, however, is the role of thrombus formation following atherosclerotic plaque rupture, leading to sudden coronary occlusion and subsequent ischemia and infarction. Thrombus aspiration provides the opportunity of intracoronary clot extraction with the aim to improve coronary and myocardial perfusion, by reducing the risk of no-reflow secondary to distal embolization of thrombus. The utility of thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention has been assessed in an increasing number of observational and randomized studies. This article reviews the contemporary data and provides insights into the validity of thrombus aspiration in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vandermolen et al. (2016) conducted a review in Acute myocardial infarction. Thrombus aspiration was evaluated. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction is reviewed to assess its utility and validity based on contemporary data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: