Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: antibody (HPA) test to current gastric cancer screening using upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) at the workplace in Japan. Methods: The data of Japanese people aged ≥40 years were collected from PubMed and evaluated in two cohorts: UGI (X-ray examination)+HPA test and UGI only. A Markov model was used for the cost-effectiveness analysis of the UGI+HPA test and UGI-only cohorts. The main outcomes were cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The impact of uncertainty was assessed using one-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). Results: A base-case analysis showed that the UGI+HPA test strategy was less costly (-US$1,039 and -US$1,496) and more effective (0.415 and 0.437 QALYs) than the UGI-only strategy in the 40- and 50-year-old groups, respectively. The UGI+HPA test strategy was assessed as a dominant strategy. In the OWSA, the tornado diagram showed negative expected costs and positive QALY gains within the established ranges for all parameters. In the PSA, more than 95% of the simulations demonstrated ICER <5 million yen (US$51,674; US$1=96.76 yen)/QALY. Conclusions: This modeling study suggests that gastric cancer screening using UGI+HPA test followed by eradication and annual opportunistic screening, compared with UGI only, resulted in lower costs and greater QALY gains for both 40- and 50-year-old groups at the workplace.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakatani et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: