Do global longitudinal strain and Galectin-3 predict major cardiovascular adverse events in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Global longitudinal strain and NT-proBNP are reliable predictors of major cardiovascular adverse events in patients with severe aortic stenosis, whereas Galectin-3 is not.
AIMS: Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) was shown to predict outcomes after valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). In the current study, we aimed to test the combined use of GLS and a marker of fibrosis - Galectin-3 - for predicting major cardiovascular adverse events (MACEs) in patients with severe AS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on 42 patients with severe AS and 42 volunteers. Patient evaluation included biochemistry tests, electrocardiogram, 24-hour Holter monitoring, the 6-minute walk test, and echocardiography. Outcomes of AS patients were defined as the composite of MACEs - sudden cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, sustained ventricular arrhythmias,atrial arrhythmias, and hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: Patients with severe AS had lower GLS, and increased levels of both biomarkers compared to the control group. Both biomarkers correlated to echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular (LV) mass index, relative wall thickness, GLS, as well as with the 6-minute walk test distance, and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). GLS and NT-proBNP predicted MACEs reasonably well, while Galectin-3 did not, after adjustments for confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the probability of freedom from MACEs was significant in patients who exhibited lower GLS HR 2.73 (95% CI 1.01-7.53), p<0.05 and higher levels of NT-proBNP HR 5.22 (95% CI 1.85- 14.51), p=0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Among tested parameters, GLS and NT-proBNP were the most reliable predictors of MACEs in patients with severe AS, while Galectin-3 performed more poorly.
Agoşton-Coldea et al. (2018) studied this question.