Why the study?
Does DDDR pacing with sensor-controlled PVARP and automatic mode switching improve maximum ventricular rate during exercise and prevent rapid tracking during atrial arrhythmias compared to DDD pacing in patients with bradycardias?
Population
13 patients with bradycardias implanted with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers.
Comparison
Dual chamber rate adaptive pacing using minute… vs Dual chamber pacing without sensor-driven rate…
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
DDDR may enable higher exercise rates than DDD in bradycardia patients; leaves open whether sensor PVARP improves arrhythmia protection.
Does DDDR pacing with sensor-controlled PVARP and automatic mode switching improve maximum ventricular rate during exercise and prevent rapid tracking during atrial arrhythmias compared to DDD pacing in patients with bradycardias?
Sensor-controlled PVARP with automatic mode switching in DDDR pacemakers allows appropriate physiological rate response during exercise while protecting against rapid ventricular tracking during atrial arrhythmias.
Lau et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: