Why the study?
What are the daily usage patterns and efficiency of remote home blood pressure monitoring over a one-year period in treated hypertensive patients?
What are the daily usage patterns and efficiency of remote home blood pressure monitoring over a one-year period in treated hypertensive patients?
Remote home blood pressure monitoring over one year shows an initial high usage phase followed by a decline, but remains capable of collecting consistent data with a reduction in extreme BP values over time.
Home BP monitoring usage declines over time yet extreme values decrease; leaves open long-term adherence strategies in hypertension cohorts.
We evaluated daily self-monitored blood pressure (BP) data collected over one year using remote home monitoring. Fifty treated, moderately hypertensive subjects (26 males, mean age 50 years; 17 females, mean age 54 years; seven exclusions) were recruited for the study in which semi-automatic arm-cuff BP measurement devices were used. The daily self-monitoring regimen had two phases of usage: one of initial enthusiasm (the first one to two months) followed by a phase of lower usage (89% versus 64%, P<0.01). Monitoring was missed more often (P < 0.01) during weekends (7.3 instances per patient) compared with workdays (5.0). Lack of motivation was not considered to be a major barrier. Approximately half of the study population was willing to continue the trial at the end of the one-year study. The occurrence of extreme BP values dropped significantly after the initial study month (P = 0.02). In conclusion, routine remote BP monitoring is capable of collecting consistent and accurate data, with sufficient sensitivity to reveal trends.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Port et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: